4th of Tishrei, 5785 | ד׳ בְּתִשְׁרֵי תשפ״ה

QR Code
Download App
iOS & Android
Home » Old Testament » OT Survey » Lesson 10 – Old Testament Survey

Lesson 10 – Old Testament Survey

AN OLD TESTAMENT SURVEY:

From Abraham to Modern Israel

Lesson 10

As we begin the 10 th week in our Biblical survey that began with the Patriarch Abraham, last week we arrived at the time of Christ meaning we’ve already covered close to 2000 years of Bible history. But we still have quite a ways to go. Today we’ll begin at the time shortly after Yeshua’s death and resurrection. Rome is the world power; it is the 4 th gentile world power as depicted by the legs of iron in Daniel’s dream statue. The Holy Lands were divided up into several Roman Provinces, with the 3 most important to our study being Judea, Samaria, and Galilee. How Judaism took form and was practiced varied greatly among these 3 provinces. Since Jerusalem, the power center of all things Jewish, was in Judea then naturally those religious leaders and would-be leaders that sought power established themselves in Jerusalem. That meant that a much more formal and strict Judaism was the norm with hundreds of Rabbis and priests each pressing for their own doctrinal agendas to be the standard. Galilee was religious and loyal to Judaism; but since they were in farming country, and far away from the influence of the Jewish religious elite, theirs was a more relaxed and practical Judaism that focused on family. Samaria, however, was the problem child. It had many Jews living there, but only some were loyal to the Jerusalem Temple and to a Jerusalem defined Judaism. Because Samaria was a mixture of Greek cities and Jewish villages, and because historically Samaria had been emptied of Israelites by the Assyrians some 700 years earlier, and then re-settled with foreigners from other nations, Samaria had become a multi-cultural population. Many different gods were worshipped there, and a more tolerate attitude to such matters was prevalent. To accommodate this from a religious standpoint a powerful group of Jewish religious elite broke from the Jerusalem Temple and created a new Temple in Samaria; of course they also set up their own separate Priesthood. A different version of the Torah was created; what has come to be known as the Samarian Pentateuch. There are around 6000 instances where the Samarian Pentateuch differed from the Torah as we know it today. Further, the Samarian Priesthood recognized ONLY the 5 Books of Moses as valid, and therefore while they celebrated the 7 Biblical Feasts of the Torah, they refused to acknowledge Purim or Hanukkah since they weren’t in the Books of Moses. As most Christians eventually come to recognize, people become so beholden to their own particular denomination that we tend to throw mud at all the others over even the minutest differences. But sometimes when there is a substantial and violent break between the existing religious authority and a new upstart, the differences are far more than cosmetic and the result can be downright hatred. Sadly we have seen much too much of this dynamic between Catholicism and the many Protestant branches of the church. But it does provide us with a good illustration of how wide the gulf was between the Jews of Samaria and those of Judea and the Galilee. Bottom line: we must grasp that there was not one Judaism; there was not one universal doctrine that all Jews adhered to; there was not one set of Jewish Traditions that all Jews followed; there was not even only one Temple or one Torah anymore. And this doesn’t even take into account the Diaspora Jews, like Paul, who were born and lived outside the Holy Lands; and the Diaspora Jews represented 95% of all living Jews; Jews from the Holy Lands (Judea, Galilee and Samaria) were a distinct minority in Judaism. The Diaspora Jews that Paul, Peter, and other disciples would go to in order to evangelize practiced several different variations of Judaism. So when we read the NT we must take into account who was speaking, who was listening (at times it was a mixed group), and where they were located. The everyday Jews of 1900 years ago were well aware of the many Jewish societal and religious variations that existed; so they understood the words of what eventually came to be the Gospels and Epistles in that context. But for gentiles, especially for Western Believers of the 21 st century, it can be quite confusing and we can come to some inappropriate conclusions that would have left the Jews of Paul’s days with their mouths gapping open in shock and surprise. Our goal should always be to ascertain the writer’s intent based on the framework of his day. Then, once understood, we should adapt that understanding to our modern times and cultures. Therefore the primary aim of Yeshua’s Talmidim (Disciples) was, naturally, to persuade their fellow Jews of all the many factions of Judaism that Yeshua was the Messiah they had been waiting for. Concerning the spreading of the Good News, Yeshua Himself said, “first to the Jew, then to the gentile”, and the Disciples took that command quite literally. Mashiach , from which we get the word Messiah, means “anointed one”; the Anointed One the Torah and the Prophets had always pointed to. Yeshua was to be the perfection of Jewish history and faith; not a new or separate religion. But, He was also the Savior of the world and it became Sha’ul’s (Paul’s) primary mission to bring the Good News to the gentiles and the “God- fearers” (although Peter and others went to the gentiles as well). God-fearers were gentiles who had accepted the Jewish ways and their God, but were not formally converted to Judaism through the circumcision ceremony. Since Rabbis reveled in micro-managing every minute detail of life, and since Rabbis often disagreed with one another, exactly who was a Jew and who wasn’t was a constant source of debate. One could be a Jew by genealogy, but even that could be challenged as there had been much mixing of the cultures and races. One could become a Jew by going through the circumcision ceremony, but with no certain Jewish heritage at all. The gospel writer Luke was probably a God-fearer, and therefore not considered to be a Jew. Gentiles were defined as anyone not Jewish; those who were not descendents of Ya’acov (Jacob). Gentiles worshipped multitudes of gods, and had no understanding of Judaism or, of course, of the history of Israel. Paul, who took the Gospel to the gentiles, found himself speaking to thousands of Jews as well, because Messianic Jews were the leaders of the new so-called “Churches” located in the various colonies throughout the Roman Empire. Remember, virtually every new “Church” that originated was nothing more than a Jewish synagogue whose members came to believe in Yeshua as the Messiah. The advent and use of the word “Church” came long after this era and it was intended to indicate a gentile Christian house of worship separate and apart from Synagogues of Messianic Jews. The word in the oldest scriptures found to date that is almost always translated into Church in Christian Bibles is the Greek word “ekklesia”. Ekklesia is a rather generic word simply meaning assembly or gathering. A much more intellectually honest word that we ought to use is “congregation”. Naturally, these Messianic Jews who attended these Believing Synagogues still considered themselves Jews, and so continued practicing the religion of the Jews, Judaism, with Christ added to the mix. But, Jews were not to be Paul’s focus. From the beginning of the Yeshua (Jesus) movement, the Messianic Jews had believed that in order to accept the Jewish Messiah, one first had to be, or become, a Jew. Logical enough; why would a gentile have need of a Jewish savior? The entire concept of a Messiah who pays the price for mankind’s sin and paves the way to a restored relationship with the God of Israel is uniquely Jewish (or, more accurately, uniquely Hebrew). This fact cannot be stated strongly enough: gentiles, that is, the entire world population other than for Jews, had no understanding of sin and redemption. However for 1400 years the Jews had been schooled and prepared for a coming Messiah. God had given them the Torah at Mt. Sinai, through Moses, to explain all. Paul had a most difficult mission: he not only had to explain the need for a Savior to an uninitiated gentile population that had been raised under a system of Greek gods and goddesses, but he also had to carefully, eloquently, and repeatedly break the news to the Jewish believers that Yeshua was not for them alone. The mere thought that the Jewish Messiah was also for the gentiles was an absolute abomination to traditional Judaism. How could this be? Had the Jewish people not spent generations separating themselves from these same pagans, at God’s command? Had they not scrupulously followed the letter of the Law, the Torah? Had Yehoveh not promised to send a Deliverer to rescue them from the hand of the gentile world (currently represented by their brutal Roman occupiers)? Were the Jewish people not called God’s “precious treasure” and His “chosen people”, from the mouths of God’s own prophets? As often as not, Paul was run out of the Jewish colonies he visited for speaking this “blasphemy”. But as the Ruach HaKodesh (Spirit of God, Holy Spirit) worked in the hearts of the Jewish believers their resistance to the concept of gentiles being included, without first becoming Jews, weakened. Sha’ul then began to preach that the gentile converts should not have to follow strict laws of Judaism, nor should they need to be circumcised. This brought on a new round of objections in which an accommodation was reached at a crucial meeting in Jerusalem in 49 AD. It was this meeting that paved the way for an avalanche of gentiles to become followers of Jesus. Just as Jerusalem was the power center of traditional Judaism, so it was for Messianic Judaism. Paul convinced James (Yeshua’s brother), who was the elder and leader of the Messianic movement in Jerusalem, to give him an audience. Paul also convinced the Messianic Jewish leadership to at least relent on the matter of circumcision for gentiles who wished to join Messianic synagogues. Let me comment here that James’s name was NOT James; it was Ya’acov (Jacob). We only call him James because the writers of the King James Version of the Bible wanted to give a special honor to England’s King James, and so they literally changed Jesus’ brother Jacob’s name to James. Jews see this series of decisions by the Messianic Jewish leadership in Jerusalem regarding the inclusion of gentiles, as one of the defining moments in their history when Messianic Judaism (since a handful of gentiles were now involved, we could for sake of easier communication call it “the Church”) went one way, and Traditional or Orthodox Judaism the other. You see, the crux of the matter was the very serious issue of ritual purity; and even within the various, often opposing, views of the many Rabbinical leaders, there was one belief they held in common: gentiles were unclean and contact with them caused a Jew to become unclean. In Acts 15 is recorded the watershed decisions of the Jerusalem council that infuriated Traditional Jews, and has been generally misinterpreted by the gentile Church. The issue was that gentile believers in Christ wanted to worship with the Messianic Jews. This meant they needed to come into a Synagogue in order to join in the rituals, feasts and worship practices, and even partake of food from time to time with Messianic Jews. Centuries of the Jews’ intentionally avoiding contact with gentiles had, therefore, created a substantial cultural problem; typically, the Jewish solution was for these gentile believers to become Jewish! Of course many gentiles balked at this notion, and Paul was among the first to recognize that as a result of Christ’s advent a new dynamic was now in place, and this prohibition of Jews dealing with gentiles had to be revisited. But, what to do? The reality is that there is no Scriptural prohibition against Jews having contact with gentiles, and it was only Jewish Tradition that declared gentiles to be unclean. The long and short of it is that the Jerusalem Council decided that if gentiles would do the following 4 things, then the matter of ritual purity would be satisfied….. as far as Messianic Jews were concerned:

1. Gentiles were to forsake fornication. That is, they were to adopt the Torah views of sexual morality, and drop the immoral Roman attitudes on sex. 2. They were to abstain from things sacrificed to pagan idols. This was more than not eating animals that had been given to the gods. The various pagan religions that these new gentile believers were coming out of sacrificed everything from wooden representations of people, to animals, to various valuable gifts, to their own children. The foundational idea here was to stop idol worship. 3. They were to abstain from blood. This is an ancient Jewish idiom referring to murder….. we commonly say “the shedding of blood” even today when referring to a murder. The idea is they were not to kill another human being. Now, it probably also referred to the practice of drinking or eating blood, another common pagan practice forbidden by Jews, but no doubt this meant that all Torah laws pertaining to blood were to be followed. 4. They could not eat the meat of animals that had been strangled. This was due to the Jewish belief that an animal, used for food and sacrifice, was to be killed quickly and as humanly as possible. Strangulation was considered inhumane. The other part of this is that it was a God-ordained law that said an animal should be drained of its blood before being eaten….. and this due to God’s instruction that the “life was in the blood”, which dates to Adam and Eve. Today most Church denominations have taken these 4 rulings to mean that gentiles were thus released from all OT commandments. That is completely out of context, ignores the cultural setting and purpose of these rulings, and could not be further from the truth. This was simply a matter of finding a solution to solve the issues of ritual purity. It was a matter of finding a way for gentile believers and Jewish believers to worship with one another. Of course these rulings caused as much or more trouble than they were intended to eliminate, and resulted in Messianic Jews having a great falling out with the non-believing Traditional Jews. Later on in the Jewish rebellions against the Romans of 67 AD and 131 AD, the Messianic Jews refused to participate in the fight against the Romans, and this cemented the wall of separation between the Messianic Jews and all other sects of religious Jews. In about 50 AD, while Yeshua’s disciples were hard at work spreading the Gospel, among the most zealous Orthodox Jews arose a secretive vigilante group called the Sicarri. The Sicarri were the most radical and militant faction of the extremist movement called the Zealots. The historian Josephus, in his famous work “Jewish Antiquities”, describes the origination of the Zealots as occurring around the same time as Christ’s birth, and being founded by a Pharisee named Zadok. The philosophy of the Zealots was that they ranked freedom as a religious matter of the highest order, and thus rebellion against Rome was holy war and totally in line with God’s will. Their numbers grew to a point that, by this time, they had become the fourth mainstream sect of Judaism, behind the Pharisees and Sadducees, but ahead of the Essenes in numbers of adherents. The only evidence that would imply that the Sicarri faction was active prior to the time of Jesus’ death, ironically, comes in the surname contributed to the disciple that betrayed Him: Judas Iscariot. Iscariot seems to be a play on the Greek word for Sicarri, which is Sicarius, rather than a typical familial name, bringing many Biblical scholars to the conclusion that in modern English we should translate “Judas the Sicarri” for Judas Iscariot. Certainly, the biblical accounts of Judas’ actions and words were those of a radical [Luke 22:48, John 6:70 & 12:6] Led by Menachem and Eleazar ben Jair, the Sicarri were said to have operated primarily in the Galilee, while the Zealots’ center of activity was in Jerusalem. Though the Zealots tended to incite riots, the Sicarri were out and out assassins… violent terrorists targeting Jews who worshipped Jesus, or Hellenists who tried to pervert Judaism, or gentile pagans, or any person or group who they felt were Roman and/or Hellenist sympathizers. Osama Bin Laden and Al Qaeda in our day would not be a bad illustration of the ideals and methods of the Sicarri. So, while the Messianic Jews roamed the land seeking more converts and further upsetting the traditional Orthodox Jews, the traditional Jews (spurred on by the Zealots) inspired rebellion against Rome, and the Sicarri vowed death to those Jews or gentiles that followed Yeshua or Rome. Roman rule was stretched thin over their vast empire, so their control over an explosive Judea was dissolving into chaos. Soon, Nero was to become Emperor of Rome, and the powder keg that was Judea got its spark. It’s about this time that we begin to hear of the Christian persecutions within the Roman Empire. While we should not minimize this at all, the picture we typically have of this era is of gentile Christians being killed for their profession of faith in Jesus. True enough; however, these persecutions were actually an anti-Jewish movement in the Empire. At the time of Nero, so-called “Christianity” was viewed as just another fanatic Jewish sect, as it still consisted in the majority, of Jews. Gentiles becoming converts to Judaism was nothing new, and was to a degree, quite commonplace. So, the average Roman citizen, and the Roman leadership, identified gentiles who believed in Christ with Judaism. In 66 AD in Caesarea Philippi, a Greek city in the northern Galil ( Galilee ), an unidentified man (presumably a pagan) walked to the front of the town Temple (this was a Greek Temple to a Greek god) and began sacrificing birds to mock the Orthodox Jews living there. Worse, it was on Shabbat ( the Sabbath ). The city’s Jews were greatly affronted. Riots rapidly escalated into open street warfare. The small local Roman garrison, well under Legion strength, could not control it. The news quickly reached Jerusalem and rioting in sympathy with their Galilean brothers started there as well. In what one could only describe as bad timing, the local Roman governor decided at that moment to brazenly rob Herod’s Temple of a sizeable amount of gold and silver, supposedly as collecting tribute owed to Rome. The local Jewish population knew that was a lie and swarmed into the streets, hurling insults at the governor. Not one to be mocked by peasants, the governor ordered the Roman troops to confront the mobs and a bloodbath ensued. The governor fled. Some 30 miles south of Yerushalayim , near the southeastern shore of the Dead Sea, arose the mountain top fortress of Masada. Herod the Great has been credited with building a lavish palace atop this 1000 foot high plateau. However, more correctly, he rebuilt and enlarged some facilities that had existed there for several hundred years. Nonetheless, while it was a favorite get-a-way spot for Herod, the grandiose Masada came to symbolize the ruthlessness and decadence of his rulership, and the unbearable oppression of Rome upon the Jewish people. A large group of Jewish protestors killed the Roman garrison there in a surprise attack, and took over the grounds. In Jerusalem and in other cities throughout Judea, Jews refused to pay the Temple sacrifice… taxes, in essence, to Rome. This was war. All throughout the Roman Empire, within its hundreds of Jewish colonies, riots and killing broke out. Nero, already in hot water from the suspicion that it was he, and not Christians (actually, it was Messianic Jews that were blamed, not gentile “Christians”) who was responsible for the devastating fires that had burned down nearly one-fourth of Rome, took action. In 67 AD, Nero sent his best general to the Galilee and took back control of the region. Yerushalayim farther to the south in Judea, was spared… for the moment. The demented Nero, hated by Jews and Romans alike, then committed suicide and Rome experienced several months of chaos, while Jerusalem won a short reprieve from the inevitable. THE ROMAN DISPERSION In 69 AD Vespasian became Emperor of Rome and sent his son Titus to take back Jerusalem from the Jewish rebels. Yerushalayim’s thick limestone walls were breached after 9 months of siege by the Roman Legions, and the Temple was seized by Titus. Titus, although a great general and fierce warrior, was no barbarian. After several months of siege, and with overwhelming victory at hand, Titus called a halt to the attack and then personally pled with the inhabitants to surrender to stop the useless carnage. They greeted him with a hail of stones and insults. He then sent forward one of the Jew’s own, hoping perhaps this man could win their trust. His name: Josephus. Josephus, the man we know as the Roman historian of Christ’s era, was actually Joseph Ben Mattitias, a Jew by birth. He was schooled by both Pharisees and Sadducees, and was very familiar with the Essenes. He had been commander of the Jewish rebel forces in the Galilee, but was captured and gave his loyalty to Rome to save his own life. Now he stood before his people and begged them to put down their weapons and submit, and their trial would be over. The Jews were determined to fight for the Holy City to the death, and so they did. By the time the Romans gained full control of Jerusalem, scores of thousands of Jews had died of starvation and disease during the siege. However, thousands of Messianic Jews escaped the horror as they had remembered Yeshua’s prophetic instructions to flee when they saw enemy armies approach the Holy City. They might not have realized that this prophecy was for a time far into the future, but to them it seemed to fit the occasion. Matthew 24:15-21 CJB 15 “So when you see the abomination that causes devastation spoken about through the prophet Dani’el standing in the Holy Place” (let the reader understand the allusion),

16 “that will be the time for those in Y’hudah to escape to the hills.

17 If someone is on the roof, he must not go down to gather his belongings from his house;

18 if someone is in the field, he must not turn back to get his coat.

19 What a terrible time it will be for pregnant women and nursing mothers!

20 Pray that you will not have to escape in winter or on Shabbat .